Wiadomości

31

Forum in English / Re: superconciousness

« dnia: Lutego 22, 2005, 07:45:36 pm »

The bottom defination of superconsciousness is a miss.
If we were robots, the enviroment wouldn't care us.
Even the life wouldn't do.
But Robots have mind.

So we must tell it - humanlike superconsciousness

32

Forum in English / Re: superconciousness

« dnia: Lutego 22, 2005, 07:43:20 pm »

  Yeah, you are good.  

The Computer has only a superconsciousness if we define superconsciousness with this abilitys, but only then.

With other ones, and you are free to choose them, it is not.

33

Forum in English / Re: "There are no answers. There are only Cho

« dnia: Lutego 22, 2005, 07:33:18 pm »

Last week I had an interesting discussion with my German-Teacher.

cckeiser perhaps it will make you hapier if I say he is a poly-solipsist too.

But he said something which may is interesting for this forum.
I asked him (the poli-solipsist) what consciousness is.
He said it is all we can put in speech.
The mind before the universe, got it speech?
Or was it unconsciousness?

34

Forum in English / Re: "There are no answers. There are only Cho

« dnia: Lutego 22, 2005, 07:29:52 pm »

"I got a question, aimed at Poly-Solipsism.  
Is the grade of the scale of Intellect (My Theory is: Intellect is Experiences + Knowledge or: The Mass of Information and the Skill to use it) depending in your theory?

I mean, perhaps there is a Golem IV or so in future.  
Would he have a higher range in Poly-Solipsism? "

Sorry for being ununderstanderable.

I think we can put every thing in a "scale of the intellect".
Everything is in this scale, a stone nearly at zero, a cow higher, a human higher than both.

My question is confusing myself now, so lets forget it.

35

Forum in English / Re: "There are no answers. There are only Cho

« dnia: Lutego 17, 2005, 03:50:46 pm »

Hi cckeiser,
I got a question, aimed at Poly-Solipsism.
Is the grade of the scale of Intellect (My Theory is: Intellect is Experiences + Knowledge  or: The Mass of Information and the Skill to use it) depending in your theory?

I mean, perhaps there is a Golem IV or so in future.
Would he have a higher range in Poly-Solipsism?

And if we say, a stone has more than nothing intellect, can he create some reality, too?
Like Golem IV perhaps can do?

I mean; If two intellects create Reality which conquers the other one, who wins?
The one with the higher Intellect?

Hope you can help me, because the message: The Reality depends from our Intellect, has throwen out many questions and it would be nice from you to take the time and clear them.

Thanks for your time.

36

Forum in English / Re: "There are no answers. There are only Cho

« dnia: Lutego 17, 2005, 03:42:34 pm »

But the Mind that is the creator of Reality. Homo sapiens are part of the illusion.

The Mind should be the Creator of Reality?
But he is the product of the Evolution which was before.
Was there no Reality before Apes become Intelligent?
Is the Evolution an Illusion without Reality?

37

Forum in English / Re: superconciousness

« dnia: Lutego 17, 2005, 03:34:35 pm »

Interesting.
Which kind of events?
Sociality, Enviroment or so?

38

Forum in English / Re: "There are no answers. There are only Cho

« dnia: Lutego 15, 2005, 10:31:06 am »

...Meaning of life is to find the menaning of life...

Meaning of Life is to Reply the Code of Life

39

Forum in English / Re: My Interview With Stanislaw Lem

« dnia: Lutego 14, 2005, 12:37:21 pm »

high IQ (his is considered one of the wisest Poles, as his IQ is something about 6789... or some ;] ).

Don't you think he know the solutions of the test's? :)

Interesting, so wellknown.
If an author would taken through in our elementary school, he nearly is a legend.
Not only because kids are forced to know him  :)

40

Forum in English / Re: "There are no answers. There are only Cho

« dnia: Lutego 14, 2005, 12:33:55 pm »

Children, born in a paradise, will not see it like a paradise.

Christian won't see that their version of paradise would be, under given parameters, Hell on Earth.

Just read "transfer" for see an example for this.

41

Forum in English / Re: superconciousness

« dnia: Lutego 14, 2005, 12:27:44 pm »

The first Topic looks like a typical Product of Antrophozentrism.
We should try to build the perfect thinking thing, not try to modify our inperferct brains, if we want superconciousness.
Our Brain mustn't be the best thing to think with, and it is surely not able to make operations as fast as the slowest computer.

It's the brilliant of the evolution, but not more.
Nothing perfect, nothing holy, nothing which can't have better alternatives.

42

Forum in English / Re: superconciousness

« dnia: Lutego 14, 2005, 12:20:58 pm »

Buehehe... so it's just a matter of scale  

It look's like, even if it sound shocking for some  

43

Forum in English / Re: superconciousness

« dnia: Lutego 14, 2005, 12:19:58 pm »

AS for superconsciousness it `s only a dream that can`t be realised.

And why it can't be realized?
Is it physically impossible to construct that is able to do what I wrote?
Don't think so.
And Computer like Golem IV has an superconciousness (or is nearer on it than we are), because he has so much knowledge and experiences.

A Stone don't remember much, therefore he had only little conciousness. superconciousness is the conciousness beyond the critical line.

44

Forum in English / Re: superconciousness

« dnia: Lutego 03, 2005, 12:10:16 pm »

Perhaps you could say it easilier, much more:
Conciousness are our added memory(you may tell it experience) and knowledge.
So, for superconciousness you just must live a million years, read a million books, made it through a million years of live between normal people and remember all of this, then you have a superconciousness.

45

Forum in English / Re: My Interview With Stanislaw Lem

« dnia: Stycznia 31, 2005, 12:18:56 pm »

Really, is he so wellknown in Poland?