22
« dnia: Września 17, 2005, 01:03:25 pm »
Allright now. You attack the guy from all sides.Have you asked yourselves why he expresses his thoughts here. Yes he`s a Lem`s reader.
It is natural when someone develops a personal philosophical conception or a world conception."The world without answers" for instance. As for me I also have a view that crosses with Keiser`s in some way.
You see that he speaks about the reality which every mind concerns to be real, the minds are different same happens to reality.
Do you believe in ghosts and witches? I do not. But it doesn`t mean that there`s no people taking them real.You see the objects but it doesn`t mean that those objects are same to everybody. colorblind people live in purple environment though it is not purple and we can see the other colours of spectrum. So talking about human psychology I can agree with a statement that thre is no answers only choices whether to believe or not in the reality we live in.
According to my conception the relity doesn`t exist,the view is not scientific but phylosophical , it happens really often that we idealize the surrounding so that it ceases to be real.If we were the robots without imagination there would be no idealzation and I would never agree with Keiser`s statement even partially.